Florida's Ocean
Horizon
Fisheries Management
Commercial and
Recreational Fisheries
The commercial fishing
industry has had an important role in the economic and cultural
development of the state since its settlement. In ways it has remained
"small business" oriented in that the independent fisherman
is the primary economic unit. Recreational anglers began to discover
Florida in the late 1800s, and by the early 1900s, Florida had become
well known for "big game angling." Today, both commercial
and recreational fishing contribute millions of dollars to the state's
economy.
Florida's
most important commercial marine species are: shrimp, mullet,
blue crab, scallops, menhaden, grouper, oysters, king and Spanish
mackerel, spiny lobster, swordfish, and red snapper. Recreational
fishermen generally target trout, king mackerel, Spanish mackerel,
amberjack, red drum, dolphin, grouper, and snapper.
Fishery
management in Florida is difficult, as it is subject to numerous
conflicts between different fisheries as well as with other ocean
resource interests or uses. For example, in recent years, declines
in king and Spanish mackerel, grouper, red snapper, and red drum
populations have required management constraints, which have led
to conflicts over allocation between commercial and recreational
fishermen. Habitat loss and degradation are major problems.
Further,
long-term depletion of certain targeted species and high mortality
of incidentally caught species can lead to permanent changes in
the balance of a marine ecosystem.
Finally,
there is disagreement as to the economic effects of fishery regulations
on fishing communities, tourism, and the general economy of the
state.
Management tools
addressing
commercial and recreational fisheries
The
Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1976 (Magnuson-Stevens
Act) created a federal fishery conservation zone. This zone, known
as the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), extends from state territorial
sea boundaries out to 200 miles from shore. In the EEZ, the United
States claims authority to manage and regulate all fisheries.
The
policies and purposes of the Magnuson-Stevens Act are directed
toward conservation, development, and management of fisheries
resources as well as development of domestic commercial and recreational
fishing. Pursuant to the Act, eight regional fishery management
councils formulate management plans. Florida is represented on
two regional councils: the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council
and the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council.
The
fishery management plans are based on national standards and are
enforced through regulations of the U.S. Department of Commerce.
While the Act recognizes state authority to regulate fisheries
within the territorial sea and, in some cases, the EEZ, the extent
of state jurisdiction is unclear.
Created
by presidential executive order, the National Recreational Fisheries
Coordination Council's purpose is to reduce any duplication
or inefficiency in recreational fisheries management efforts.
The
Council also ensures that federal agencies consider the health
and conservation of aquatic systems that support recreational
fishing, and monitors conservation efforts under the Recreational
Fishery Resources Conservation Plan.
At the state level, management responsibilities for fisheries
have been shuffled among numerous agencies and authorities for
over a century. Through the years, fishery management has been
largely accomplished through detailed legislation in response
to specific issues with little or no consideration of a comprehensive
fishery management policy. In addition, through a ballot initiative
Florida voters recently added the Net Ban Amendment to the Florida
Constitution. The result is a mass of confusing and sometimes
conflicting statutes, including more than 220 local laws.
The
Marine Fisheries Commission (MFC) is composed of seven members
appointed by the Governor. The MFC has full rule-making authority
over marine life, except endangered species, subject to approval
by the Governor and Cabinet as the Board of Trustees of the Internal
Improvement Trust Fund (Trustees). As of October 1996, 208 sets
of rules recommended by the MFC had been approved by the Trustees.
In
an effort to promote interstate cooperation regarding fishery
management goals, Florida is party to the Atlantic States Marine
Fisheries Compact (ASMFC) and the Gulf States Marine Fisheries
Compact (GSMFC). Each compact creates a council, which includes
representatives of the member states. The councils provide a forum
for states to discuss problems of marine fisheries management
and to develop coordinated polices. The councils also make recommendations
to the member states and their legislatures to coordinate state
efforts and to the National Marine Fisheries Service for development
of federal fisheries management policy.
Artificial Reefs
Florida has more artificial
reefs than any other state, and is the only state to allow nongovernmental
groups to erect and maintain artificial reefs. Although reefs may
enhance recreational and some commercial fishing opportunities,
there have been many criticisms of artificial reef development.
For example, questions exist as to whether the reefs actually increase
the total fish population or merely draw fish from other areas,
contributing to further depletion of stocks. Other criticisms concern
construction and siting. Reefs that are improperly constructed can
disappear, break apart, or damage natural habitat. Poorly sited
reefs can create navigational and safety hazards, user conflicts
between commercial and recreational fishermen, or be of limited
benefit if placed too far offshore.
Management tools
addressing artificial reefs
The
National Fishing Enhancement Act specifies that artificial reefs
are to be constructed to enhance commercial and recreational fisheries.
The Act requires the development of a National Artificial Reef
Plan to enhance fishery resources, increase fishery production,
and benefit coastal economies by encouraging "properly designed,
constructed, and located artificial reefs" based on the best
scientific evidence. The plan includes general criteria and guidelines
for siting, materials, design, and construction of artificial
reefs, and suggested mechanisms and methodologies for permit compliance,
monitoring, and managing reefs. It is, however, general in scope
and is intended to provide a framework for use by state, regional,
and local planners in developing detailed, site-specific plans.
·
Anyone seeking to erect an artificial reef must obtain a permit
from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for its siting and construction.
A permit from the U. S. Coast Guard for marking its location is
also required.
·
The Florida Artificial Reef Program was established by the Florida
Legislature to provide grants to local governments for establishing
artificial reefs in state waters. Rules to implement the program
provide the criteria, priorities, and standards for project evaluation
in allocating state funds.
·
All applications by reef developers, regardless of whether they
receive state funds, must be reviewed by the Florida Department
of Environmental Protection (DEP), which has authority for permitting
the construction of artificial reefs in state waters.
Aquaculture
Aquaculture involves
the controlled cultivation of fish, shellfish, and plants in fresh,
brackish or salt water. It is a relatively underdeveloped industry
in the United States compared to the rest of the world. Aquaculture
has become of great interest to those relying on Florida's oceans
for economic survival. With the depletion of many fisheries and
the unemployment resulting from such depletion as well as increased
regulation, many fishermen are turning to aquaculture as a new career.
Most
of Florida's aquaculture does not take place in the ocean. Most
oyster and clam cultivation takes place in nearshore waters. Other
activities, such as tropical fish production, fish and shrimp
hatcheries, and aquatic plant farms, generally occur in upland
areas. The primary problems encountered by onshore aquaculture
facilities are competition with coastal development for sites,
permitting of discharges from operations, and dredge and fill
regulations.
As
interest in aquaculture grows, so does the potential for ocean
use problems. Aquaculture in ocean waters may create conflicts
with other established uses and raise concerns over introduction
of disease, pollutants and non-native species.
Management tools
addressing aquaculture
The
Florida Legislature enacted the Florida Aquaculture Policy Act
for the purpose of enhancing the growth of aquaculture while protecting
the environment. Under the Act, the Department of Agriculture
and Consumer Services (DACS) is responsible for coordinating research
and development and providing assistance to persons in the industry.
In addition, DACS is required to issue or deny aquaculture certificates
to identify aquaculture producers and products.
In
1996 DACS finalized the Florida Aquaculture Plan in consultation
with industry, research institutions, and federal, state, and
local agencies. It is considered the blueprint for developing
aquaculture in the state, and is intended to assure effective
and nonduplicative efforts to expand aquaculture development and
prioritize research and funding needs.
Back |
Contents | Next
|