![]() |
| ||||
Results
Of particular interest was exploring the possibilities of economic growth
that will support the conservation of natural areas, such as eco-tourism
and military defense training. Very important to the discussions at
the Summit was the acknowledgement that the United States Military's
long-term presence; economic value and spatial needs are crucial to
the Panhandle's future. Further, there was acknowledgement that there
is an important overlap between the region's environmental and agricultural
lands along with the military's need for a largely rural air-space corridor
east from Eglin Air Force Base to the Apalachicola National Forest and
then the Gulf of Mexico. Significantly, it was noted that the military
corridor and base-non-encroachment areas often align with conservation
"hot spots". Several existing public conservation areas already
serve as lynchpins to the military air-space needs (Apalachicola National
Forest, Tates Hell Swamp and Blackwater State Forests for example.)
The following summary points were derived from the input and concensus of the Summit participants: A.
Military Corridor and Buffers - Links & Overlap with Conservation
and Forest Lands Recognize,
identify and protect the military corridor and base buffer lands from
higher density and intensity development. Future usage requires maintenance
of lower density landscapes.
Within
the corridor and military base buffer areas, retain natural landscape
processes and functions- particularly the wildlife corridor connectivity
and linkage aspects (both micro and macro.) Include riparian and flood
protection buffers. Overall, preserve the biodiversity of the Panhandle
by avoiding fragmentation of habitat and helping to realize that different
species have different scales of landscape needs.
Highlight
the productive and functional aspects of private rural "working landscapes"
within the corridor and buffer areas to encourage continuation of such
uses through the use of conservation easements.
Parks
and forests are islands along the corridor that can serve to bolster eco-tourism,
which helps to keep these lands essentially on the tax rolls (via sales/bed
taxes).
For
lands within the corridor, actively promote the continuation of traditional
hunting, fishing and other nature-based recreational uses. Include
maintenance of private hunting lands in the discussion of recreational
lands.
Wherever
possible, include the preservation of the North Florida culture
- incorporate cultural and historical resources into planning.
Planning,
Acquisition and Easement Needs
For the existing corridor and buffers to remain viable, more fully
involve the local comprehensive planning process. Consider changes
to the requirements for the local comprehensive and regional policy plans
to better identify, integrate and maintain vital green infrastructure
and military use areas. It was suggested that the consideration of green
infrastructure needs to be a statutory requirement in local government
comprehensive plans and regional policy plans.
The
Military should be more involved in local land use planning, even
beyond the corridor maintenance aspects. Local governments plans and land
development regulations can offer additional protections beyond the corridor
and immediate base buffers. A tiered approach would be effective with
less protection in existing suburbanized/urbanized areas and more protection
moving outward into the existing rural and conservation lands. The effort
must involve partnerships and involvement with public planning processes.
Could involve required Joint Land Use Study (JLUS) of for jurisdictions
adjacent to bases.
Next Steps Develop
a Task Force with stakeholders from local, regional, state and federal
government with NGOs, citizens, large landowners and individuals from
the business and education communities to further study the maintenance
of military corridor and buffer needs in the Florida Panhandle - Task
Force would be useful to study and develop relevant information (e.g.,
which lands? how much land? opportunities for multipurpose use and conservation
and the resources needed to implement and sustain.) A Task Force would
also help guide getting local, state and other stakeholders to direct
attention toward Washington DC to help with funding. Should act rapidly
to fulfill this action.
Presently, work with large landowners first to acquire environmentally
sensitive lands, purchase easements for certain working rural lands and
encourage local governments to incorporated corridor and base buffer strategies
into their comprehensive plans.
Develop
Greenway Champions within city, county and business leadership
Support
should be translated into dollars for the project from state and federal
governmental agencies, including: the Department of Defense (Federal),
Florida Forest Legacy program & Florida Rural and Family Lands Program
(FDACS -Forestry), Florida Forever & OGT - Greenway and Trails funds
(DEP), Florida Community Trust (DCA), Florida Department of Transportation
(Transportation enhancement dollars and road mitigation monies), and the
North West Florida Water Management District (Florida Forever, among possible
others.
B.
Future Transportation Planning Affecting Northwest Florida Greenway Provide
for limited access highways through corridor/buffer areas. Make sure
that transportation projects have very limited access to prevent or inhibit
growth from following the road. Identify areas that should be off-limits
to any future roads and work to stop/control development along existing
road corridors that are agricultural or silvicultural lands within the
Greenway corridor.
The
use and improvement of current road corridors should be first priority
- prior to new road construction. Possibly focus on 10-mile wide east-west
corridor (e.g., route 79 or 331.) Make such a project a priority and a
demonstration project. Maximize use of existing infrastructure before
implementing new projects. The use of corridor management tools such as
access control and signal coordination should be factored into the planning.
Ensure
a project is necessary, as opposed to speculative. Ensure that projects
are based on fully documented needs of projected traffic counts and that
these needs are consistent with development entitlements already in local
comprehensive plans.
Develop
elevated/extended portion of the roads to allow wildlife crossings
- do this for new bridges and when replacing older roadway components.
Address the need for wildlife and recreational underpasses/overpasses
during road planning to make wetland crossings elevated from upland to
upland area. (?)
Identify
and use mitigation lands to protect significant wetland systems within
the Greenway.
Implementation
Current
Florida processes of Florida DOT are not sufficient to tackle large-scale
infrastructure development across extensive sensitive natural and rural
areas without resulting in induced development in these areas. The
up-and-coming Florida Efficient Transportation Decision Making (ETDM)
process may not be adequate to address corridor/greenway protection needs
without overarching regional guidance/directives.
The
protection of Green Infrastructure components should be a required consideration
during the planning and construction of transportation projects by MPOs
and FDOT.
Require
a regional approach, and use a Task Force as discussed above, with
broad representation and a proactive approach, and then bring back to
the MPOs and the FDOT planning process.
Cities
and counties should be connected to the green infrastructure. Should
include not only bicycle connections but pedestrian connections as well.
Safe connections for the bicycle, pedestrian and equestrian paths and
connections need to be given high consideration.
|